Peggy Deras: Help fund the Ohio recount |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Friday, November 12, 2004 - 18:10 | |
|
Finally! Something we can do besides sending each other all these great emails...
There's going to be a recount in Ohio, instigated through a joint endeavor by the Green and Libertarian Presidential Candidates (David Cobb and Michael Badnarik).
They need $150,000 by Monday, Nov. 15. Current count is $71K and has more than doubled the $35K it was at 8AM this morning. I just donated some money because I think this is the only way to prove fraud.
Check it out and pass this message along:
http://www.ohiogreens.org/
http://www.votecobb.org/
http://badnarik.org/
Let's get to the bottom of this and find out who really won!
Peggy Deras, CKD, CID |
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Kim Theobald-Stark: a cover-up in the Bush Medicare and Medicare Drug Bill. |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Friday, November 12, 2004 - 15:16 | |
|
Howard,
Hi. So good to hear from you. I would like to point out a cover-up in the Bush Medicare and Medicare Drug Bill for a Part D and what else that bill does to the consumer for health care that is not being brought to the forefront of discussion by our politicians, our lawmakers and yet little ol' me has found it to be true simply because I am a licensed insurance producer, that means sales and service agent of health care products. I have a captive license means I work exclusively for Combined Insurance Corpporation of America, an AON company.
Anyhow, first my beef is the same with the Medicare Drug Act for 2006 and the changes it brings in benefits and options for drug cost help as most seniors have. As Senator Kennedy and our Minnesota state Medicare department representative spoke at Anoka Senior Center on this bill in their attempt to glamorize it and run point for the government in their attempt to basically get in on the baby boomer market in the industry of drug revenue from this huge age group approaching retirement. They said the average senior, being according to them approximately 28 to be precise who responded prior stating they need drugs but could not afford them need this bill. Yet they bragged like it was so great, the savings was going to save this person 10-12% off the cost of their drugs!
What this bill states is that private insurance companies can no longer sell a medigap insurance policy with drug coverage in it after 2006, those grandfathered in are OK. What they don't tell you is that that policy in Minnesota for example is our Extended Basic Policy, other states Plan H or J I think, is those policies are providing long term care in the home and nursing homes for the highly medicated or early medicare disabled citizens who stand a snow balls chance in hell of getting through underwriting to get this kind of care the only other way it is available, unless one is wealthy and self-funds, by virtue of a Long Term Care policy! These wonderful Extended Basic policies provide 80% drug coverage and 100% after a $1000 out of pocket simultaneously is tabulated at the 80% level! My own company watchguards how many of these we agents sell because 5% of the senior population buys them because although expensive at $500+ a month for the supplemental policy, usually their drug expense, long term care, and all the other benefits it gives far exceed the policy premium. My own company tells me the expense of these policy for the insurance company 110% of the premium received so they are a burden for insurance companies. Wah, Wah, then my own company should raise it, as other companies Extended Basic policies run as high as $978 per month.
Did you understand that Howard? So after 2006 the passage of this drug bill puts the most critically healthy individuals literally on the streets for their home care and long term care or further driving up Medicaid and bankrupting this country instead of on the insurance companies which can leverage themselves well enough and raise rates to avoid bankruptcy if left alone. Analysis shows Part D only benefits the highly medicated because you don't even really started to save anything to make it better than other programs out there that can save you 30-60% through a Medicare approved pharmacy like SavRX, etc. But does it really benefit them, they need these Extended Basic policies as they cover all of ones out of pocket costs after Medicare pay first, and many things Medicare doesn't like custodial care, wheel chairs, ramps up the homes, major dental, and nursing home care. We are indeed in very scary times in this country. Bush stood on values, whose values? Big Business is a materialistic value core when you suffer your elderly and your children and they are so good are covering this up in the passage and discussion of this bill!!!
And also what's wrong with Medicare contracted with these HMO companies like Blue Cross Blue Shield? Lots, that is what's wrong with Medicare, is it has misled too many seniors to believe they still have Medicare when they are actually no longer in FULL medicare when they choose any other option than a private insurance supplemental to Medicare. And then they suffer high, unpredictable and unexpecgted and unpromised out of pocket expenses to one of our most vulnerable population groups. (OK BCBS does have an insurance division, but only sell their HMO/PPO product, senior gold to seniors), Medica, Health Partners and U-Care (Our Minnesota based Medicare Managed Care contracted companies) and then there is even more fundamentally wrong with the Unicare and Human choices being allowed to manipulate advertising to seniors to falsely represent their coverage)
Well, my kids are home and have earned a chinese dinner out for chores well done!
bye Howard,
Kim Theobald-Stark |
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Charles Auld: What else can go wrong? |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 22:45 | |
|
Let's see ... Fallujah is being claimed a victory, despite the fact that
even the military is beginning to admit that it did nothing to weaken the
enemy; they didn't find Abu Musab al Zarqawi and hundreds of "foreign
insurgents." The power of martyrdom in the Islamic culture was badly
underestimated ... the defenders of Fallujah are becoming national heroes.
And while our troops were preoccupied with that disaster, the freedom
fighters have retaking Ramadi, Samarra, Latifiyah, Kirkuk, Mosul and
several suburbs in Baghdad. It looks like the US hold on the "Green Zone"
is increasingly tenuous ... Sunni clerics are calling for a boycott of the
January elections, which I doubt will take place during that month.
What else can go wrong?
Charles Auld
Arab, Alabama
|
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Johanne M. Dictor: I say Dean should start his own 3rd party. |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 22:33 | |
|
Howard -
If Dean can't get the nomination to head up the DNC then I say he should start his own 3rd party.
I can't take the Democrats anymore. They are just a bunch of wimps. The other night I heard Pelosi quoting out of the bible. So, it looks as though they think we should take on religious zealots.
Johanne M. Dictor
Oakland CA |
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Steve Ybarra: Concerning Gov. Dean for chair of the DNC. |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 21:20 | |
|
Concerning Gov. Dean for chair of the DNC.
OK, so here is the deal.
Get the list of the members of the DNC from the DNC. Get each DFA group to take on contacting the local member of the DNC and meet with them personally.
Then you will have a campaign.
Steve Ybarra
Sacramento CA |
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Jean Hehn-Bradley: attempts to weaken protections for our nation's wildlife and wild places. |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 20:50 | |
|
Post-election Riders Threaten Wildlife & Habitat
Dear Friend of
Wildlife:
Post-election attempts to weaken protections for our nation's
wildlife and wild places have already begun. Behind closed doors -- with no
public debate or scrutiny -- members of Congress are considering a proposal
to undermine protections for the wildlife and wild places that American
cherish.
In question are a series of legislative riders that may be
tacked onto the must-pass Omnibus Appropriations bill due to be voted on any day
now. Legislative riders are backdoor attempts to pass legislation that would
likely not withstand votes on their own. Included on this list of threats are
provisions that would approve a 200,000 acre land swap in an Alaskan Wildlife
Refuge to promote oil and gas development, waive environmental reviews for
cattle grazing on our public lands and prevent citizens from challenging timber
sales in our nation's largest National Forest.
Another possible rider
would literally gut the Endangered Species Act -- our nation's bedrock wildlife
protection law. In this specific case, the rider would amend the
Endangered Species Act to allow critical habitat areas to be destroyed and to
require continuation of development plans that are proven to threaten endangered
species. If passed, this legislation would be the most major rewrite of the
Endangered Species Act since 1982!
ACTION: Help stop these attacks on
wildlife by calling your representative and two senators. Be sure to make
the following two points:
1) Tell them to oppose any riders that would
undermine protections for America's endangered species and special places like
our national forests, wildlife refuges and other public lands.
2)
Urge them not to let these devastating riders be attached or voted through on
the Omnibus coattails. Let them know that massive public policy changes should
not be done through stealth riders. Rather, they should be subject to
rigorous public review and debate.
To reach your senators, call the
Capitol Switchboard at .
To find your
members of Congress, go to: http://action.nwf.org/nwf/leg-lookup/search.tcl
We need more recovery of endangered
species and more protection of essential habitat areas, not less.
Thank you in
advance for taking the time to speak out on behalf of our nation's wildlife and
wild places!
NWF's Wildlife
Team
P.S. Called your members of Congress and want to do more? Tell
your friends and family to call their members of Congress, by forwarding this
alert along to them.
Let us know you took action by sending an
email with your name and address to . Please include "Appropriations" in the subject
line.
|
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Jane Cutler: Dear Friends - take heart! |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 20:20 | |
|
Dear Friends -
take heart! Listen to Mr. Jefferson:
Jane
Cutler
"A little patience, and we shall see the
reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve, and the people, recovering
their true sight, restore their government to its true principles. It is true
that in the meantime we are suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the
horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public debt. But If the game
runs sometimes against us at home we must have patience till luck turns, and
then we shall have an opportunity of winning back the principles we have lost,
for this is a game where principles are at stake."
--Thomas
Jefferson, June 4, 1798, in a letter to John Taylor after passage of the Alien
and Sedition Acts
|
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Mayme Trumble: Gonzales not fit to be Attorney General! |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 19:24 | |
Forwarded by Millie LaRuffa
This man is not fit to be Attorney General!
Mayme
Trumble
ALBERTO
GONZALES A Record of Injustice
by Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin www.progressreport.org
Here is some information on President
Bush's nominee for Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.
As White
House Counsel
GONZALES APPROVED MEMO AUTHORIZING TORTURE: An
August 2002 Justice Department memo "was vetted by a larger number of
officials, including...the White House counsel's office and Vice President
Cheney's office." According to Newsweek, the memo "was drafted after White
House meetings convened by George W. Bush's chief counsel, Alberto Gonzales,
along with Defense Department general counsel William Haynes and [Cheney
counsel] David Addington." The memo included the opinion that laws prohibiting
torture do "not apply to the President's detention and interrogation of enemy
combatants." Further, the memo puts forth the opinion that the pain caused by
an interrogation must include "injury such as death, organ failure, or serious
impairment of body functions‹in order to constitute torture." The methods
outlined in the memo "provoked concerns within the CIA about possible
violation of the federal torture law [and] also raised concerns at the FBI,
where some agents knew of the techniques being used" overseas on high-level al
Qaeda officials. [Gonzales 8/1/02 memo (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/dojinterrogationmemo20020801.pdf)
; WP, 6/27/04 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8534-2004Jun26.html)
; Newsweek, 6/21/04 (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5197853/site/newsweek)
; NYT, 6/27/04 (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60E14FB3C5C0C748EDDAF0894DC404482)
]
GONZALES SAID MANY GENEVA CONVENTIONS PROVISIONS ARE
OBSOLETE: A 1/25/02 memo written by White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales said
"the war against terrorism is a new kind of war" and "this new paradigm
renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners
and renders quaint some of its provisions." The memo pushes to make al Qaeda
and Taliban detainees exempt from the Geneva Conventions' provisions on the
proper, legal treatment of prisoners. The administration has been adamant that
prisoners at Guantanamo are not protected by the Geneva Conventions. [Gonzales
1/25/02 memo (http://msnbc.com/modules/newsweek/pdf/gonzales_memo.pdf)
; Newsweek, 5/24/04 (http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4989481/)
]
GONZALES ADMITTED HIS VIEWS "COULD UNDERMINE U.S. MILITARY
CULTURE": The 1/25/02 memo shows Alberto Gonzales was aware of the risk that
ignoring the Geneva Conventions could create for the military. One concern
expressed is that failing to apply the Geneva Conventions "could undermine
U.S. military culture which emphasizes maintaining the highest standards of
conduct in combat, and could introduce an element of uncertainty in the status
of adversaries," which is what happened at Abu Ghraib. Secretary of State
Colin Powell strongly warned against taking this decision, as did lawyers from
the Judge Advocate General's Corps, or JAG. This week, a federal judge ruled
that "President Bush had both overstepped his constitutional bounds and
improperly brushed aside the Geneva Conventions" when he established military
tribunals in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to try detainees as war criminals.
[Gonzales 1/25/02 memo (http://msnbc.com/modules/newsweek/pdf/gonzales_memo.pdf)
; Bloomberg, 6/14/04 (http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&refer=columnist_woolner&sid=aJEp1ExaMybo)
; New York Times, 11/9/04 (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/09/politics/09gitmo.html?hp&ex=&en=ef8ed60281cb7cb4&ei=5094&partner=homepage)
]
As Texas Chief Legal Counsel
DEATH PENALTY
MEMOS: GONZALES'S NEGLIGENT COUNSEL: As chief legal counsel for then Gov. Bush
in Texas, Gonzales was responsible for writing a memo on the facts of each
death penalty case -- Bush decided whether a defendant should live or die
based on the memos. An examination of the Gonzales memoranda by the Atlantic
Monthly concluded, "Gonzales repeatedly failed to apprise the governor of
crucial issues in the cases at hand: ineffective counsel, conflict of
interest, mitigating evidence, even actual evidence of innocence." His memos
caused Bush frequently to approve executions based on "only the most cursory
briefings on the issues in dispute." Rather than informing the governor of the
conflicting circumstances in a case, "The memoranda seem attuned to a
radically different posture, assumed by Bush from the earliest days of his
administration‹one in which he sought to minimize his sense of legal and moral
responsibility for executions." [Atlantic Monthly, July/August, 2003 (http://www.fdp.dk/act/030928_texas_clemency.php)
]
MEMORANDUM ON TERRY WASHINGTON: A CASE STUDY IN INCOMPETENCE:
In his briefing on death-row defendant Terry Washington -- a mentally retarded
33-year-old man with the communication skills of a seven-year-old -- Gonzales
devoted nearly a third of his three-page report to the gruesome details of the
crime, but referred "only fleetingly to the central issue in Washington's
clemency appeal‹his limited mental capacity, which was never disputed by the
State of Texas‹and present[ed] it as part of a discussion of 'conflicting
information' about the condemned man's childhood." In addition, Gonzales
"failed to mention that Washington's mental limitations, and the fact that he
and his ten siblings were regularly beaten with whips, water hoses, extension
cords, wire hangers, and fan belts, were never made known to the jury,
although both the district attorney and Washington's trial lawyer knew of this
potentially mitigating evidence." Nor did he mention that Washington's lawyer
had "failed to enlist a mental-health expert" to testify on Washington's
behalf, even though "ineffective counsel and mental retardation were in fact
the central issues raised in the thirty-page clemency petition" it was
Gonzales's job to review. This all came at a time when "demand was growing
nationwide to ban executions of the retarded." [Atlantic Monthly,
July/August, 2003 (http://www.fdp.dk/act/030928_texas_clemency.php)
]
As Texas Supreme Court Justice
GONZALES
ACCEPTS DONATIONS FROM LITIGANTS: In the weeks between hearing oral arguments
and making a decision in Henson v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance, Justice
Alberto Gonzales collected a $2,000 contribution premium from the Texas Farm
Bureau (which runs the defendant insurance company in this case). In another
case, Gonzales pocketed a $2,500 contribution from a law firm defending the
Royal Insurance company just before hearing oral arguments in Embrey v. Royal
Insurance. [ Texas for Public Justice (http://www.tpj.org/page_view.jsp?pageid=117&pubid=60)
]
For more information on Gonzales check out this American Progress rapid response document.
Read the American Progress Statement on Alberto Gonzales |
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Jennifer Willis: problems with electronic voting machines have surfaced. |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 18:45 | |
|

|
ACTFORCHANGE ACTIVISM UPDATE: November 10, 2004
You are receiving this newsletter because you have previously taken
action on ActForChange in support of progressive values.
IN THIS BULLETIN:
Investigate
Electronic Voting Machines
Now that November 2 has come and gone, some disturbing reports of
problems with electronic voting machines have surfaced.
Click
here to take action!
For example:
- In Columbus, Ohio, an electronic voting system reported that Bush
received 4,258 votes while Kerry received 260 votes in a precinct where
records show only 638 voters cast ballots;
- In North Carolina, a machine lost more than 4,500 votes due to a
mistaken assumption about the memory capacity of a computer;
- In Youngstown, Ohio, and South Florida, numerous voters
complained that when they tried to cast votes for Kerry, the machines
instead recorded their votes for Bush.
All in all, more than 30,000 complaints have been gathered from
across the country. In the midst of such turmoil, it's crucial that an
independent authoritative investigation be undertaken to sort this all
out.
Click
here to take action!
Please forward this newsletter to your friends and help spread
the word about this important campaign!
Pass
Meaningful Election Reform
While the
2004 election experienced an increased turnout that should be celebrated,
the 2004 election was also flawed by far too many obstacles to full
participation.
Click
here to take action!
Our national elections are run via a
mishmash of local, city and state regulations and agencies, so that voters
in one state are subject to different rules than voters elsewhere. While
Congress passed the Help America Vote Act as a first step toward election
reform, November 2 demonstrated that much more is needed. Congress should
make the passage of meaningful election reform the first order of business
during the upcoming November special session.
Click
here to take action!
Please forward this newsletter to your friends and help spread
the word about this important campaign!
Thank you for
working to build a better world.
Jennifer
Willis Director ActForChange.com | 
|
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
Nancy Brannigan: I am a Catholic on a crusade of my own. |  |
|
warning: implode(): Bad arguments. in /export/sites/seniorsforamerica.com/docs/includes/theme.inc on line 37. Submitted by Howard2 on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 14:38 | |
|
Hi Howard,
I had a few bad days and occasionally slip into gloom, but I think if I keep active in the fight against this growing power of the Republican religious right to control America I will come out of it. I e-mailed NY Times today regarding an article in Sunday's paper and it felt good.
I am a Catholic on a crusade of my own to oppose a return to the old hell and damnation church, which with the inspired dedication of Pope John XXIII, was changed by Vatican II. The Catholics who have held on to old traditions were a big factor in defeating John Kerry, a really fine Catholic who could have made a change for the better for America.
I want to congratulate you on all of your hard work and was happy to hear you are keeping in touch with those others who put so much of themselves in trying to save our country from another four years of Bush. I hope the U.S. can survive it. I want to keep in contact with "seniorsforamerica".
Thanks again for all of your prompt e-mail returns to my requests. We have a lot of work to do in the next four years. Be happy about all the time and effort you devoted to the cause of our country. The people like you were my inspiration.
Nancy Brannigan |
| [ Howard2's blog | add new comment ] | |
 |
PRIVACY NOTICE: | | SeniorsforAmerica.com asks for certain personal contact information for the purpose of organizing.
Your information will only be used by the admins of this site, local area coordinators, and event planners.
Your personal information will not be used for any other purpose, or added to any other list without your written consent.
For more information or to report suspected abuse of this policy, please contact for an immediate response.
| |
|